Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Irish Potato Production and Consumption Amid Climate Change and Variability Among Small Scale Farmers in Narok South Sub- County-Kenya

Received: 3 July 2025     Accepted: 14 July 2025     Published: 30 July 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study explored on Irish potato production and consumption among small scale farmers amid climate change and variability in Narok south sub- county-Kenya. The study employed focus group discussions and cross sectional descriptive survey research methods for data collection. A total of 393 small scale farmers were randomly sampled through multistage sampling procedure for descriptive survey and controlled focus groups discussion. Data from the cross section survey was screened and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 program to give frequencies and percentages. Chi-square was calculated and inference made at confidence level of α=0.05. focus groups discussion was analysed qualitatively. The results indicated that, majority (71.5%) of the respondents got their Irish potato seeds for planting from previous harvest. Handsomely 64.1% of the respondents responded by indicating that they planted other crops when they lacked Irish potato seeds. The study further indicated that, significant 92.9% of farmers were not taking on any an initiative on value addition method which could enhance their money in their pockets. Majority (76.9%) didn’t know how to make French fries in their homes nor sell it to their neighbours. The study moreover, indicated that a sizeable (35.3%) of the respondents consume Irish potato as an accompaniment to other foods. Further, about 33.2% of the respondents indicated that, they consume Irish potato as main dish. The study also highlighted that 82.3% of the respondents highly observed pest and disease as Irish potato production challenges amid climate change and variability. The study concluded that climate change and variability has influence on Irish potato production and consumption and therefore affecting food security and availability in Narok County. This study therefore recommends that; the agricultural extension agents should endeavour to train farmers on positive potato seed selection or similarly direct farmers where they can get certified quality Irish potato seeds.

Published in International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11
Page(s) 155-169
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Consumption, Utilisation, Value Addition, Small Scale Farmer, Food Security, Ware Potato

1. Introduction
According to the nexus of agricultural production, Nutritional availability, health status, and income generation came into limelight lately. Across the globe about one billion people worldwide generally suffer from food insecurity. It’s marked that, the main food nutrients which are vitamin and mineral are deficit in food. This put billions of people at compromising health status. It also noted that more than two billion people still face food insecurity intermittently due to varying notch of poverty . According to International Livestock Research Institution Agriculture is the primary source of calories and essential nutrients and is presently a major source of income for eighty percent of the world’s poor.
For sound and healthy life, adequate and appropriate nutrients need to be incorporated in food production . Presence of poor diets, disease, and other factors mean that many people do not get the adequate and appropriate nutrients they need for a sound and healthy life. Moreover, hunger and malnutrition have long lasting effects throughout the life cycle, since undernourished offspring grow up to be less vigorous and prolific than they are actually supposed to be .
For this reason, the need for new alternatives for a sustainable agricultural production and consumption options of Irish potato in mass will provide a practical solution to alleviate the problems of malnutrition problems as potato serves as a vital source of calories, vitamins, proteins, potassium and fibre . A more reliable harvest could give farmers the confidence to invest on improved techniques that could further boost their yields and nutrition status as they evade the consequences of persistent drought which is brought by climate change .
The International Food Policy Research Institute tries to analyse the amount of calorie availability by 2050 with and without climate change. After analyses the institute predicted that calorie intake will decline and this will add an additional 24 million undernourished children who are within 0-5 years, this is 21% much more compared with the world without climate change. Half of this population would be living in sub-Saharan African Nations.
Similarly, analysed the study which was steered in Ethiopia to predict three food requirement and consumption scenarios by 2050. The first scenario was purely based on situation where there was assumed there was no climate change and have normal population growth. Under this scenario they indicated that there will be food requirement and consumption of 2322 and 2160 kcal per capita per day respectively. The second scenario was also based on normal population growth with climate change. The scenario indicated that there will be food requirement and consumption of 2296 and 1788 kcal per capita per day respectively. The third scenario was based on low population growth with climate change. The scenario indicated that there will be food requirement and consumption of 2322 and 2192 kcal per capita per day respectively .
1.1. Irish Potato Harvesting, Sorting and Transport to the Market
According to harvesting and marketing of Irish potato is critical stage on Irish potato farming and thus requires skilled labour. Harvesting of Irish potato in Africa at small scale level is done manually using hoes . This means if done by those people who are not experienced it can seriously lead to damage of the most wares compromising the quality. This damaged wares are finally left with a farmer forming a loss on his part .
After harvesting the farmers takes the first step by removing dirt (soil) from ware potatoes . This is followed by sorting into various sizes. Those bigger in sizes are bulked together and are meant for large market. Medium sizes are also bulked together and are meant for, nearby market while small ones are bulked together and meant within the villages. These small ones are also stored for next season and stored as seeds .
Transport of Irish potato from farm to the market place is very important factor the farmer considers since failure to handle Irish potato properly can also lead to loss of farmers produce . Farmers are advised to use sisal twine bags so as to provide aeration of wares. This is because air tight bags lead to rotting of ware potato very quickly .
1.2. Irish Potato Consumption
In Kenya, according to Irish potato consumption statistics trend shows that, in 1990 consumption per capita per year was 26.93kg which rose to 34.43kg in the year 1991 and significantly dropped to 20.20 in the year 1993. Consumption per capital per year dropped significantly on the year 2000 where consumption was 16.15 kg. The highest consumption of Irish potato was noted on the year 2005 with 63.62kg. From this back ground information consumption of Irish potato is so far below than expected . This decline of consumption is attributed to low production and consumption value addition options .
Although improving potato production has proved to be a difficult challenge for plant breeders due to occasional change of weather . In Kenya, Irish potato production and consumption have been noted that, it has high nutritive value and has many value chain benefits including animal feeds . Therefore, consumption of it could fill the gap of food insecurity within the country and at small scale household levels . on his research noted that many farmers do not understand the nutritional value and value chains attached to Irish potato production and their benefits. If policy makers, researchers, agricultural extension and farmers at large can be able to give merit where it’s due, Irish potato production can be solely adopted to curb poverty, famine and malnutrition. on the other hand indicated that, in most African communities’ if they embrace Irish potato consumption, it could be very important milestone in curbing hunger since its value chains products can be stored for longer period and thus they could provide nutritive values during periods of drought.
At small scale households’ levels, Irish Potato consumption according to is relatively low due to less knowledgeable on the numerous chances and recipes for adding value and product divergence for household utilization. Irish Potato can produce several value added recipes which could lead to provision of numerous vitamins and minerals as well as phytochemicals including carotenoids and polyphenols. In fact, shows that 150g potato (medium size) when boiled with its skin provides 27mg of vitamin C (45% of the total human daily value), 620mg of potassium (18% of total human daily value), 0.2mg vitamin B6 (10% of human daily value) and trace amounts of, riboflavin, folate, thiamine, magnesium, niacin, zinc, iron, and phosphorus.
Moreover, adds that, the skin of Irish potato (2g) contains fibre corresponding to that of many whole grain pastas, breads as well as cereals. Nutritional wise, Irish potato contains carbohydrate content of approximately 26 g in a 150 g medium potato. Most small scale households usually use and utilise traditional Irish potato recipe which is boiling and stewing. This traditional recipe appears to be less appealing to both youth and children Further to this, boiling and stewing does not easily and quickly break down the starch in potato and therefore digestive enzymes allows it to travels and be flushed out from digestive system. Some recipe allows the starch in potato to travel up to colon/large intestines where it is broken down to provides starch for gut microorganisms and thus boosting the health status of digestive system. For this reason, promotion of Irish potato production and consuming it in various value added product technologies will have numerous advantages both as food security crop as well as food nutritional crop. As food security crop, it will enhance production adoption as well as improve the incomes of smallholder farmers through maintainable proceeds generation. Moreover, as food nutritional crop will enhance households at small scale levels with good health .
Chweya affirms that food utilization in relation to climate change can be affected directly through decreasing of densely rich micro nutrients plants or altering specific micro nutrients content through certain methods such as flooding .
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
Figure 1. Map of study area in Narok south sub county.
This study was conducted in Narok south sub- county in Narok county-Kenya. Administratively, it has six (6) administrative Wards generally Sagamian, Sogoo, Melelo, Ololulunga, Loita and Maji-Moto / Naroosura. These six wards have a population of 238,301 with 46,723 households . On coverage, it covers an area of approximately 4,959.20 km2 and it is found in the South western side of Kenya .
The sub county borders Tanzania to the South, Narok west to West, Bomet to the North and Narok North to the East. Upper zone of the sub county practise crops production while lower zone practice pastoralism. Wards practicing Irish potato production includes Sagamian, Sogoo, Melelo and Ololulunga and is mainly produced by small scale farmers .
The sub county has a bi modal rainfall dispersal pattern. The long showers occur on March to May (MAM) and short rains occurs mid-October to December (OND). During this period Irish potato is planted by farmers and especially during long rains. The average annual rainfall ranges between 500-1800mm. Temperature ranges between 7°C in July to 28°C in January and March. Average temperature is 18°C. This average rainfall and temperature is usually optimum for Irish potato production .
2.2. Research Design
Target population for this study was small scale Irish potato farmers in Narok south sub county Kenya. This study embraced two research designs which are cross sectional descriptive research design (survey) and explanatory research design (focus group discussions). These two research designs allowed the study to derive insights into the opinions, attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge regarding potato production strategies and consumption options amid climate change and variability. A cross-sectional descriptive survey design was used to understand Irish potato production and consumption at small scale farm levels. Explanatory research design on the other hand was used during focus groups discussion to understand Irish potato production and consumption trends across villages.
2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Procedure
This study embraced a multi-stage sampling procedure involving three stages within the study area. The first stage was purposively eliminating two wards from the study. area These are Loita and Naroosura/Majimoto wards. These two wards since across does not practise Irish potato production. The second stage involved villages selection within the remaining four wards which had high concentration of Irish potato production. The third and final stage involved random sampling of respondents within villages based on Kenya population survey of 2019 and using household as data collection point . As indicated on the Table 1.
Table 1. Number of households and percentage sample size per ward.

Wards

No of households

Percentage per Ward

Villages practising potato production

household sample

1.

Ololulung’a

6,161

28.8

66

113

2.

Melelo

6,280

29.4

54

116

3.

Sogoo

5,102

23.9

52

94

4.

Sagamian

3,837

17.9

43

70

Total

21,380

100%

215

393

Sample size of respondent households were then calculated using formula below.
n=N1+N(e)2(1)
The research used 95% confidence level with an error of 5% and after calculation 393 respondent households were interviewed; However, during data coding and entry 25 questionnaires didn’t reach threshold to be analysed and therefore they were rejected leaving 368 questionnaires.
Focus groups discussion used quota sampling procedure to select groups for discussions. The study used controlled sampling procedure where each focus group had between 10-12 members in size. The group consolidation considered gender, age and village of living. Twelve (12) focus groups discussion (three from each ward; Ololulunga, Melelo, Sogoo and Sagamian) were formed and the meetings were held at central points (fundamentally at a churches, assistant chiefs’ boardroom or on a selected farmer residences). Similarly, key informant in-depth interviews samples were carried out at Sub county agricultural officer and ward agricultural officers.
2.4. Data Collection Procedure
Household data gathering procedure used questionnaires. The questionnaire was initially subjected to validity test through agricultural and academic experts. The questionnaires used amalgamation of both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods and hence both open ended and close ended questionnaires were used. These questionnaires were used by five (5) trained research assistants to gather data based on proportionate stratified random sampling interview for small scale Irish potato farmer’s households. Household interviews were conducted through transect walk within the villages. The first interviewee within each village was sampled randomly and the next respondent depended on sample size within each village as indicated on Table 1.
During focus group discussions data collection procedure, a moderator was used to guide the interview discussions process to gather data. The moderator was guided by interview guide which was developed earlier and therefore guided the group discussions and hence deviation from research area was avoided.
2.5. Data Analysis
Data got from the field was clustered according to category (cross sectional and focus groups). For cross sectional quantative data, it was checked for correct entry, coded and then entered into the computer through Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 (SPSS 22.0) software program. Using this software program, data was evaluated to indicate statistical differences or relationships among variables. Chi-square was then calculated and inference made at a confidence level α=0.05. Multiple linear regression analysis was calculated to test the hypothesis using below formulae.
Y = a + b1x1 + b2x2 + b3x3 + b4x4 + b5x5 + b6x6 + …+ bnxn(2)
Where: Y= Irish potato production and consumption in tonnes/year
a = constants (i.e. land)
X1 = Certified Irish potato seeds availability (tonnes)
X2 = Maximum and Minimum temperatures (°C)
X3 = Rainfall and humidity (mm)
X4 = Earth skin temperature (°C)
X5 = Farmers endowment (Kenya shillings)
X6 = Agronomic practises (Days)
X7 = Irish potato value addition options (Numbers)
X8 = Agricultural extension information (Messages)
bnxn = Infinity of variables
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Effects of Climate Change and Variability on Irish Potato Production Across Age Groups Among the Respondents
Effects of climate change and variability against Irish potato production respondents across various age groups, respondent viewed differently (Table 2). Those aged below 25 years old, significantly (9.5%) of the respondents indicated that effects of climate change and variability on Irish potato production had greatly affected its production over the years. Only 1.9% within this category (below 25 years) who indicated that effects of climate change and variability have not affected Irish potato production over the years. This small percentage may be attributed to their age factor whereby they are entering into farming career and therefore they didn’t have much experience. Those respondents aged over 65 years of age only 0.5% of them were unable to observe effects of climate change and variability against Irish potato production. This may be attributed to the fact that this category of the age group is more experienced on Irish potato production and due to their extensive experience of farming coupled with age factor they were able to note any change on production.
Those respondents aged between 26-35 years of age 11.4% outlined that climate change and variability has effect on Irish potato production while only 1.1% didn’t see any effect of climate change and variability against Irish potato production. However, those respondents within age category of 36-45 majorities (17.1%) showed that climate change and variability has significantly affected Irish potato production over the years while only few (1.6%) didn’t see any effect of climate change and variability against Irish potato production.
Table 2. Observation of potato production amid climate variability.

Observation of potato production amid climate variability

More affected

Less affected

Not affected

freq

%

freq

%

freq

%

Below 25 years

35

9.5

6

1.6

7

1.9

26-35

42

11.4

8

2.2

4

1.1

36-45

63

17.1

13

3.5

6

1.6

46-55

98

26.6

15

4.1

5

1.4

56-65

37

10.1

2

0.5

4

1.1

Over 65

18

4.9

3

0.8

2

0.5

Totals

294

79.9

48

13.0

26

7.1

Source: Field data 2022.
For those respondents between age group 46-55 years’ majority (26.6%) said that climate change and variability had significantly affected Irish potato production with only few (1.4%) had not observed any effects of climate change and variability against Irish potato production. May be this 1.4% of the respondents had just joined farming venture after retiring from formal sectors and now they were venturing into farming. This therefore did not give them enough practical experience in order to have divergent view of production trend over the years amid climate change and variability.
3.2. Source of Irish Potato Seeds Amid Climate Change and Variability
On Table 3 majority (71.5%) of the respondents got their seeds for planting from previous harvest. This significantly attributes that most farmers kept recycling their seeds therefore planting inferior seeds each and every season significantly contributing to low Irish potato production. Significantly 13.3% of respondents sourced their potato seeds from their neighbours while 8.4% of the respondents sourced their potato seeds from nearby market and only 6.8% of the respondents sourced their potato seeds from certified producers.
Table 3. Source of Irish potato seeds.

Source of Irish potato seeds

freq

%

From neighbours

49

13.3

From certified producer

25

6.8

From previous harvest

263

71.5

From market

31

8.4

Total

368

100.0

Source: Field data 2022.
From focus group discussions, the practise of recycling seeds and sourcing from neighbours who’s their seeds are still from recycled harvest source is highly in the area. The reason being that, farmers had confidence on quality of their own seeds and high assurance of seeds ready to be planted immediately the rain sets in. They also preferred neighbours’ seeds as they could monitor the production growth of potatoes from planting, shooting up to harvesting. The main aim of this practise is to save cost incurred on farm expenses. Seeds from the market were least preferred since they never knew their source and their production. This phenomenon leads to less quantity and quality production of Irish potatoes over the years.
3.3. Coping with Seed Un Reliability Amid Climate Change and Variability
According to Table 4, majority (73.1%) of farmer’s respondents indicated that when quality Irish potato seeds were not available they opted to plant those seeds which were available despite their shape, colour as well as diseased. From focus group discussions, the diseased potato seeds meant for planting are initially the diseased part is cut and thrown away. The left part is smeared with ash to prevent rotting and further penetration of disease. This scenario predicted that despite government effort to promote Irish potato farming, the production remains to dwindle if this trend continues. Substantial 65.8% of the respondents outlined that, they recycle the wares which they had harvested. Focus group discussions further outlined that farmers recycle their ware seeds up to a maximum of four seasons. This indicated that despite their production prowess on Irish potato production; the production kept declining due to recycling trend which kept low production each and every year.
Table 4. Coping with Irish potato seeds un reliability.

Coping with un reliability

Yes

No

freq

%

freq

%

Plant other crops

236

64.1

132

35.9

Lease land meant for Irish potato

119

32.3

249

67.7

Reduce acreage of Irish potato

221

60.1

147

39.9

Plant that is available

269

73.1

99

26.9

Recycling the one harvested

242

65.8

126

34.2

Source: Field data 2022.
Handsomely 64.1% of the respondents responded by saying they planted other crops when they lacked Irish potato seeds. This implies that farmers plant what they can get in their farms instead of leaving it fallow for the next season. They see this as wastage of rainfall instead of seeing it as an increasing fertility into their farms. Significantly, 60.1% of the respondent reduced acreage of Irish potato and make immediate decision to plant another (other) food crop (s) in the plot intended for Irish potato initially. About (32.3%) of farmers leased out their land meant for Irish potato production to other farmers. From focus group discussion farms are only leased out when the farmer opts to abandon farming of Irish potato completely but as long as the farmer is on Irish potato farming then leasing out is not an option and not welcomed.
3.4. Harvesting and Handling of Irish Potato
From focus group discussions, Irish potatoes are ready for harvest when the shoot starts to wither. Farmers use slasher to slash the shoots with the aim of making faster tuber enlargement. To know that the wares are very ready for harvest, farmers will un bury few and determine the wares size. They also check peeling of the skin. Those wares which peel out easily are not ready for harvest but those which peel with a bit of difficult are ready for harvesting. After harvest it’s followed with sorting and handling of the produce with aim of marketing or storage.
On Table 5 majority (78.5%) of respondent’s produce their ware potato for market and through value chain actors. This phenomenon is even culminated by value chain actors offering services of harvesting and sorting Irish potato at cost. This indicates that value chain actors offer their services with aim of making more money from the farmer. Those good and appealing wares are sorted for the market while those which looked inferior and diseased on the other hand 37.5% of ware potato produced are meant for seed recycling/multiplication. significantly 32.6% of the ware potatoes produced is meant for household consumption and 27.7% of ware potato produced is meant for animal feeds.
Significant 55.7% of the respondent farmers aggregate their ware potatoes with neighbours for easier marketing and also to make sizeable load together for the truck loading. Minority of the farmers 18.5% responded that they put their wares on the diffuse stores especially those meant for seed multiplication. This implies that majority of the respondents 78.5% didn’t have plan for their wares after harvesting apart from marketing and offloading it to the market. This scenario changes market dynamics where farmer gets little despite the efforts incurred on farming of Irish potatoes. This also implies that despite the farmer respondents working very hard on their farms producing Irish potatoes, in the end they opt to offload the highest quality into the market and left with inferior ones. The plausible result indicates that the respondents put market priority first instead of their household food security.
Table 5. Handling of Irish potato produce after harvest.

Handling of produce after harvest

Yes

No

Freq

%

Freq

%

Meant for market

289

78.5

79

21.5

Put them into diffuse store

68

18.5

300

81.5

Aggregate with neighbours

205

55.7

163

44.3

Store for home consumption

120

32.6

248

67.4

Sort for seed for next season

138

37.5

230

62.5

Sort for animal feeds

102

27.7

266

72.3

Source: Field data 2022.
3.5. Transport of Irish Potato from Farm to Market
On Table 6, majority (74.7%) of respondents’ farmers indicated that they use donkeys to transport their ware potato from their farm into the market. The reason being that, roads within the area are not conducive for other means of transport. Furthermore, donkeys are relatively cheap as mode of transport though time consuming. With increase of motorcycles in the country, transport using this means (motorcycles) had started to become common in the area with 63.6% of the respondents using it. However, during focus group discussions respondents pointed out that motorcycle carries limited load capacity and expensive in comparison to the use of donkeys. Moreover, motorcycle could not penetrate those areas where road networks are dilapidated.
Table 6. Transport of Irish potatoes from farm to market.

How do you transport potatoes from farm to market

Yes

No

Freq

%

freq

%

Use donkey

275

74.7

93

25.3

Use of shoulder/back

212

57.6

156

42.4

Use of motor cycles

234

63.6

134

36.4

Marketer comes for them at farm

188

51.1

180

48.9

Source: Field data 2022.
Use of shoulder/back, a sizeable 57.6% of respondents responded that, they use it to transport ware potato from household to market or to an aggregator point where other means of transport could not reach. Marketer transport options were 51.1% and were least used. The reason being most marketers according to respondents were money oriented and they only preferred places where they couldn’t incur extra cost from their agreed cost. They preferred only to take ware potatoes from the point where they can be able to load into their trucks.
3.6. Consumption and Utilization of Irish Potato Amid Climate Change and Variability
About 35.3% of the respondents agreed that they use Irish potato as an accompaniment to other foods. Significantly 33.2% of the respondent indicated that, they consume Irish potato as main dish when they didn’t have anything else to eat. A sizeable 32.6% of the respondents consume Irish potatoes when boiled and mashed, 31.5% of the respondents consume it when roasted. 25.3% of the respondents consume it as French fries (chips), 24.7% of the respondents consume it as crisps, and 22.3% of the respondents stewed it for consumption while only 19.0% of the respondents make dried potato chips which are later deep fried (Table 7).
Table 7. Consumption and utilisation of Irish potato in Narok south sub county.

Irish potato Utilization

Yes

No

freq

%

freq

%

As main dish

122

33.2

246

66.8

As accompaniment

130

35.3

238

64.7

As French fries

93

25.3

275

74.7

As crisps

91

24.7

277

75.3

As stewed

70

19.0

298

298

Roasted

116

31.5

252

68.5

Boiled and mashed potatoes

120

32.6

248

67.4

Dried potato chips

82

22.3

286

77.7

Source: Field data 2022
Irish potato consumption across different age groups (Table 8) indicated that consumption of Irish potato as main dish (staple food) only 4.3% of respondents aged 25 years and below consumed it as main dish, A sizeable 4.6% of respondents aged between 26-35 years consumed it as main dish, About 7.1% of the respondents aged between 36-45 years consumed as main dish, Significant, 10.3% of the respondents aged between 46-55 years consumed it as main dish, nearly, 4.9% of the respondents aged between 56-65 years consumed it as main dish and only 1.9% of the respondents above 65 years consumed Irish potato as main dish. This indicates that only 33.2% of total respondents interviewed consumed Irish potato as main dish. The least preferred method of Irish potato consumption and utilisation method was making dried potato chips with only 1.1% of respondents below 25 years doing it and majority (4.9%) of the respondents aged between 46-55 years were making dried potato chips.
The study further indicated that those respondents above 65 years; 4.1% of the respondents consumed Irish potato in form of boiled and mashed, very significant 2.4% of them consumed Irish potato in roasted diet. While only 1.1% of the same category respondent’s occasionary made French fries in their homes and only 0.5% of this age respondents make crisps in their homes.
From focus group discussions respondents indicated that, they tried to make dried potato chips and failed and more potatoes are consumed by those people who are much older than young generations”. Further they outlined that older people (above 65 years old) they prefer roasted potatoes than other methods and especially taken during morning hours as breakfast.
Table 8. Irish potato consumption and utilisation across age groups amid climate change and variability in Narok south sub county.

Irish potato consumption and utilization

Below 25 years

26-35

36-45

46-55

56-65

Above 65 years

Totals

Frq

%

Frq

%

Frq

%

Frq

%

Frq

%

Frq

%

Frq

%

As main dish

16

4.3

17

4.6

26

7.1

38

10.3

18

4.9

7

1.9

122

33.2

As accompaniment

20

5.4

20

5.4

32

8.7

37

10.1

15

4.1

6

1.6

130

35.3

As French fries

18

4.9

16

4.3

16

4.3

31

8.4

8

2.2

4

1.1

93

25.3

As crisps

16

4.3

9

2.4

23

6.3

28

7.6

13

3.5

2

0.5

91

24.7

As stewed

4

1.1

5

1.4

16

4.3

18

4.9

17

4.6

10

2.7

70

19.0

Roasted

7

1.9

13

3.5

29

7.9

42

11.4

16

4.3

9

2.4

116

31.5

Boiled and Mashed potato

3

0.8

10

2.7

23

6.3

47

12.8

22

6.0

15

4.1

120

32.6

Dried potato chips

3

0.8

4

1.1

16

4.3

30

8.2

14

3.8

15

4.1

82

22.3

Source: Field data 2022
Chi square test analysis and Pearson product moment correlation of Irish potato consumption and utilization across age groups showed statistical significance as shown on Table 9.
Table 9. Chi square test analysis and Pearson product moment correlation of Irish potato consumption and utilisation against age groups.

Irish potato consumption and utilisation across age groups

Chi square test analysis

Pearson product moment correlation

χ 2

df

p

r

As main dish

1.742

5

0.884

-0.22

As accompaniment

3.082

5

0.687

0.076

As French fries

7.615

5

0.179

0.109

As crisps

8.220

5

0.145

0.052

As stewed

28.679

5

0.000

-0.229

Roasted

10.496

5

0.0062

-0.149

Boiled and mashed potatoes

41.496

5

0.000

-0.335

Dried potato chips

42.165

5

0.000

-0.310

3.7. Farm Level Value Addition of Irish Potato Amid Climate Change and Variability
From focus group discussions farmers adds value their wares at farm level through removing dirt from wares, sorting those damaged and diseased, grading wares into three grades (Big (large), medium and small). The large sizes are specifically meant for bigger markets including industries which are in Nairobi and Nakuru while medium ones are meant for nearby local and urban markets. Small ones are sold by farmers to other farmers as seeds for next season. Rigorous sorting leaves a farmer with small inferior wares. These inferior wares are the one the farmer saves for his household consumption and also as seeds for the next season as indicated earlier. This scenario leads to dwindling of Irish potato production despite high promotion by the government.
According to Table 10. a significant 92.9% of farmers were taking an initiative on removing dirt on their ware potatoes so that they can be able to increase sale and also due to the pressure from value chain actors who don’t carry dirty ware potatoes. Only 23.1% of the respondents make French fries/chips in their homes and sell it to their neighbours. Majority (76.9%) didn’t know how to make French fries in their homes nor sell it to their neighbours. Similarly, very small significant 21.5% of the respondents know how to make crisps with 78.5% admitted that they didn’t know how to make crisps and therefore they can’t sell it to their neighbours.
Table 10. Value addition of Irish potato amid climate change and variability.

Value addition of Irish potato at farm level

Yes

No

Freq

%

freq

%

Removing dirt

342

92.9

26

7.1

Sorting and grading

322

87.5

46

12.5

Sourcing market

134

36.4

234

63.6

making French fries/chips

85

23.1

283

76.9

Making crisps

79

21.5

283

78.5

Storage for future marketing

68

18.5

300

81.5

Source: Field data 2022.
Substantial 87.5% of respondents indicated that, they do sorting and grading of the wares as dictated by value chain actors’ grading conditions. Only 18.5% of respondents admitted that they store for future market. This indicates that 81.5% didn’t know Irish potato storage methods.
From focus group discussions, French fries/chips are food for the youth and children in fast food restaurants in towns. Similarly, crisps are meant for children and only bought in outlet stores in towns. Grown up people don’t eat crisps or chips at home or in fast food restaurants. In fact, men outlined that, they do not consume crisps and French fries as they are meant for children. Farmers also outlined that they do not source market for their wares but off load it to the value chain actors. Due to this factor, value chain actors take advantage of the farmers and therefore they dictate the price of the ware potatoes.
3.8. Farming Challenges Faced During Irish Potato Production Amid Climate Change and Variability
At farm level according to Table 11, Proliferation of pest and disease was highly observed by about 82.3% of the respondents indicating that it was becoming menace on Irish potato farms. While 13.9% of the respondents had minimal observation and only 3.8% of the respondents didn’t observe any proliferation of pest and disease on their farms. Majority (79.3%) of respondents highly observed weed infestation while 12.0% had minimal observation and only 8.7% of the respondents didn’t observe any weed infestations on their farms (Table 11).
Table 11. Irish potato production challenges amid climate change and variability.

Challenges of farming

Highly observed

Minimal observed

Not observed

frq

%

frq

%

Increase cost of land operations per unit area (acre)

275

74.7

77

20.9

16

4.3

Reduced quality of potato produce

252

68.5

79

21.5

37

10.1

Reduced motivation to provide credit by creditors

189

51.4

109

29.6

70

19.0

Lack of scientific and technical information systems on climate change and variability

216

58.7

94

25.5

58

15.8

Counterfeit inputs

258

70.1

82

22.3

28

7.6

Low harvest per acre

236

64.1

88

23.9

44

12.0

Pest and diseases proliferation

303

82.3

51

13.9

14

3.8

Household Financial constraints

277

75.3

76

20.7

15

4.1

Land degradation on potato farms

201

54.6

118

32.1

49

13.3

Inadequate rainfall

271

73.6

73

19.8

24

6.5

High weed infestations

292

79.3

44

12.0

32

8.7

Persistent Irish potato failure

244

66.3

74

20.1

50

13.6

Lack of agricultural extension messages

211

57.3

81

22.0

76

20.7

Dilapidated infrastructures

213

57.9

73

19.8

82

22.3

Source: Field data 2022.
Substantial 75.3% of the respondents highly outlined that household financial constraints were also their major hindrance on Irish potato production especially with current hard economic times, while 20.7% had minimal observation and only 4.1% of the respondents didn’t observe any household financial constraints. In this study 74.7% of the respondents had highly observed increase of land operation costs on their Irish potato farm while minimal 20.9% of the respondent had observed significant increase of land operations costs and only 4.3% of the respondents didn’t observe any increase on farm operation costs.
Significantly 73.6% of the respondents highly outlined that inadequate rainfall due to climate change and variability was also a major hindrance in cultivation of Irish potato. While 19.8% had minimal observation and only 6.5% of the respondents didn’t observe any inadequate rainfall due to climate variability. Counterfeit input was also highly outlined by 70.1% of the respondents as a challenge toward maximum Irish potato production. While 22.3% had minimal observation and only 7.6% of the respondents didn’t observe any presence of counterfeit products on their farming experience.
Reduced quality of potato produce was also highly recognised by 68.5% of the respondents as threat to Irish potato production. While 21.5% had minimal observation on reduced quality of Irish potato and only 10.1% of the respondents didn’t observe any quality reduction of Irish potato on their farms. For soil degradation 66.3% of the. While 20.1% had minimal observation and only 13.6% of the respondents didn’t observe any low harvest of Irish potato per acre due to low soil fertility.
Lack of scientific and technical information systems on climate change and variability was highly outlined by 58.7% of respondents as major hindrance on Irish potato production while 25.5% minimally outlined it as major hindrance and only 15.8% of the respondents didn’t outline lack of scientific and technical information systems on their farming experience as major hindrance. This may be attributed to the fact that majority of the farmers had gained practical experience on Irish potato production and those yet relied on their neighbours, parents and siblings and agricultural officers for training. Road infrastructural is very key element on Irish potato production as serious dilapidated roads proves very difficult to transport Irish potatoes from farms to the market . In this research 57.9% of the respondents highly observed dilapidated infrastructures in their area hindering smooth Irish potato cultivation while 19.8% had minimal observation of dilapidated roads and only 22.3% of the respondents didn’t outline any dilapidated road infrastructures in their area hindering smooth Irish potato production movement.
In this study about 57.3% of the respondents highly observed lack of agricultural extension messages hindering smooth Irish potato cultivation while 22.0% had minimal observation and only 20.7% of the respondents didn’t outline lack of agricultural extension messages. On soil test analysis majority (79.9%) of respondents didn’t carry soil test analysis of their land to determine the deficient nutrients on their soils. Majority 51.4% of the respondents also highly outlined challenge of credit advancement by banks and Sacco’s, 29.6% of respondents had minimal observation and only 19.0% of the respondents didn’t observe any challenge on credit facilities.
From focus group discussions, it was stated that, those farmers who had financial handicap relied on merry go round contributions where members pooled resources together and give it to one of their member each month until the last member is given. With this, those who were financially handicapped were setting the date to be given to coincide with their planting of Irish potatoes. Farmers also stated that impact of climate change and variability had led them to have dwindling harvest per acre of Irish potato each and every year. The highest challenge of farming of Irish potato within the area was outlined as proliferation of counterfeit inputs especially agro chemicals which was rampant in the area and this forces farmers to spray different types of chemicals at the same time targeting the same host, moreover Potato bacterial blight (Phythophtera infestans) was outlined by respondents as menace to Irish potato production in the area.
Chi square test analysis and Pearson product moment correlation of age against Irish potato production challenges indicated statistical significance as shown on Table 12.
Table 12. Chi square test analysis and Pearson product moment correlation of Irish potato production challenges against age amid climate change and variability.

Irish potato production Challenges against age of the respondents

Chi square test analysis

Pearson product moment correlation

χ 2

df

p

r

Increase cost of land operations per unit area (acre)

32.962

10

0.000

0.356

Reduced quality of potato produce

46.200

10

0.000

0.176

Reduced motivation to provide credit by creditors

91.746

10

0.000

0.109

Lack of scientific and technical information systems on climate change and variability

36.165

10

0.000

-0.081

Counterfeit inputs

59.365

10

0.000

0.229

Low harvest per acre

32.862

10

0.000

-0.159

Pest and diseases proliferation

18.913

10

0.040

0.335

Household Financial constraints

1.143

10

0.000

-0.033

Land degradation on potato farms

4.490

10

0.923

-0.223

Inadequate rainfall

1.150

10

0.000

0.056

High weed infestations

49.101

10

0.000

0.102

Persistent Irish potato failure

53.537

10

0.000

-0.084

Lack of agricultural extension messages

52.506

10

0.000

-0.249

Dilapidated infrastructures

5.166

10

0.880

-0.168

4. Conclusion and Recommendations
From the study, the findings show that climate change and variability has influence on Irish potato production and consumption therefore affecting food security and availability in Narok county. This climate change and variability leads to variation on Irish potato production and consumption as there was evident that there was low production and value addition options of Irish potato at farm levels. Practice of recycling seeds and sourcing from neighbours who’s their seeds were still from recycled harvest source was highly in the area. Coupling this phenomena and impact of climate change and variability led them to have dwindling harvest per acre of Irish potato each and every year. It is from this back ground information that this study recommends that, the agricultural extension agents within the area should endeavor to train farmers on positive potato seed selection or similarly direct farmers where they can get certified quality Irish potato seeds. Further to this they should strive to train farmers on various Irish potato value addition options. Putting this in place will not only increase food security within their households but will also equip them with up to date information and therefore help them make informed decision on Irish potato production and value addition strategies.
Abbreviations

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organisation

FAOSTAT

Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database

GoK

Government of Kenya

IFPRI

International Food and Policy Research Institute

ILRI

International Livestock Research Institute

JICA

Japan International Cooperation Agency

KNBS

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics

KPHC

Kenya Population and Housing Census

MOA

Ministry of Agriculture

MOALF

Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries

NPCK

National Potato Council of Kenya

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

UN

United Nations

Acknowledgments
This research study would like to acknowledge Narok county government especially department of agriculture for allowing the researchers to interact freely with respondents’ farmers. The department also provided villages practising Irish potato production and helped in coming up with focus group discussions meeting point.
Author Contributions
Francis Njoroge Kabochi: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing - original draft
Felix Lamech Mogambi Mingate: Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing
Samuel Ogada Ochola: Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing
Funding
This research was fully funded by researchers.
Data Availability Statement
All the data reported here are available from the authors upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Abiodun, O. O., Bukola, R. A., and Oluwadara, P. A. (2016). Food Utilization, Nutrition, Health and Farming Households’ Income: A Critical Review of Literature. Research gate publishers.
[2] Andersson, J. (1996). Potato cultivation in the Uporoto Mountains, Tanzania: an analysis of the social nature of agro-technological change. African Affairs, 96, 85-106.
[3] Anderson, P. K. (2008). Global perspective of Potato production in emerging markets. SCRI, Dundae Scotland.
[4] Ayanlade, A., and Radeny, M. (2020). COVID-19 and food security in Sub-Saharan Africa: implications of lockdown during agricultural planting seasons. npj Sci. Food 4(1), 1-6.
[5] Battisti, D. S., and Naylor, R. L. (2009). Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat. Science 5911, 240-244 (323).
[6] Beriso, B. B. (2018). Factors Affecting Smallholder Farmers Potato Production in Shashemene District, West Arsi Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management
[7] Blom-Zandstra, G. and Verhagen, J. (2015). Potato production systems in different agro ecological regions and their relation with climate change. Wageningen UR (University & Research centre) Business Unit Agro systems Research. Netherlands.
[8] Bezawit, T. (2011). Analysis of socio-economic factors influencing potato production at household level. The case of Shashemene, Shalla and Siraro Counties in West Arsi Zone; Ethiopia Agiro. International Development Studies (MID).
[9] Catherine, K. (2008). Evaluation of Irish potato production and marketing performance: a case study of Mbeya rural District, Mbeya region, Tanzania. Sokoine University MSc Thesis.
[10] Chweya, J. A. E. (1998). The diversity of traditional leafy vegetables. CAB International.
[11] Durr, G., and Lorenzl, G. (1980). Potato production and Utilization in Kenya. Lima: International Potato Centre.
[12] Easterling, W., Aggarwal, P., Batima, P., Brander, K., Erda, L., Howden, M., Kirilenko, A., Morton, J., Soussana, J. F., Schmidhuber, J. (2007). Food, fibre, and forest products. In: Parry.
[13] FAOSTAT. (2020). Trends in potato yields per hectare in Kenya from 2010 to 2018. Retrieved 22nd July, 2024 from FAOSTAT data website:
[14] Fischer, G., Shah, M. Tubiello, F. N. and Van Velthuizen, H. (2005). Integrated assessment of global crop production. Philos. T. Roy. Soc, B, 360, 2067-2083.
[15] Foerch, W., Patti, K., Thornton, P., Kiplimo, J. (2011). Initial Sites in the CCAFS Regions: Eastern Africa, West Africa and Indo-Gangetic Plains, Version 2. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, Denmark.
[16] Gebru, H., Mohammed, A., Dechassa, N., & Belew, D. (2017). Assessment of production practices of smallholder potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) farmers in Wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security, 6(1), 1-11.
[17] Geoffrey. A. (2010). Academic journals Drought tolerance in crop plants. American journal of plant physiology 5(5): 241-256, 2010. Retrieved 29 April 2014 from
[18] GoK. (2019). The Crops (Irish Potato) Regulations. Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 39 5th April, 2019 (Legislative Supplement No. 10).
[19] GoK. (2013). ‘Narok county development profile 2013-2017’. Nairobi: Ministry of Devolution and Planning. Government printer. Kenya.
[20] GoK. (2012). National Agricultural Sector Extension Policy (NASEP), Agricultural Sector Coordination Unit (ASCU), Website:
[21] GoK. (2009). Narok South Development Plan. Ministry of Planning and National Development. Government printer. Nairobi.
[22] GIZ. (2016). Modernization options for potato value chain in Kenya and Nigeria.
[23] IFPRI. (2001). Empowering women to achieve food security; vision 2020, focus no. 6. international food and policy research institute, Washington D C.
[24] ILRI. (2022). Risk-based and One Health approaches for improved food safety in Africa. ILRI, Nairobi Kenya.
[25] JICA. (2022). Potato production.
[26] Kabira, J. N. (2002). Linking Ware Potato Growers with Processors of French-fries: Progress Report, February - August 2002. Tigoni: National Potato Research Centre.
[27] Kabungo, C. V. D. (2008). Evaluation of Irish potato production and marketing performance: a case study of Mbeya rural district, Mbeya region, Tanzania
[28] Kaguongo, W., Gildemacher, P., Kinyae, P., Adrade, J., and Forbes, G. (2007). Farmer Practices, Adoption of CIP-Derived Potato Varieties and Economic Impact in Kenya and Uganda. Research Report. Nairobi: International Potato centre.
[29] Kaguongo, W., Maingi, G., Barker, I., Nganga, N., & Guenthner, J. (2014). The value of seed potatoes from four systems in Kenya. American Journal of Potato Research, 911, 109-118.
[30] Kariuki, J. (2010). Hunt for Traditional Foods in Kenya. Government printer. Nairobi.
[31] Khan, M. A, (1981). Evaluation of food selection patterns and preferences. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 15, 129-153.
[32] Kinyae, P. M., Lung’aho, C., Njenga, D. N. and Kabira, J. N. (1996). Adoption of Potato.
[33] Kinyae, P., Kirumba, W., & Muchara. M. (2004). Irish potato market survey. Promotion of Private Sector Development in Agriculture (PSDA). Ministry of Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya.
[34] Kirumba, W., Kinyae, P. and Muchara, M. (2004). Irish Potato Market. Survey Promotion of Private Sector Development in Agriculture. GTZ/MOA.
[35] KNBS. (2019). Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Kenya population and housing census vol. 1; Population by county and Sub County. Government printer. Nairobi.
[36] KPHC. (2019). Kenya Population Housing Census 2019. Government printer. Nairobi.
[37] MoA. (2006). Strategic Plan 2006-2010. Nairobi: Kenya Ministry of Agriculture.
[38] MoALF. (2016). The National Potato Strategy 2016-2020.
[39] Muthoni, J., Nyamongo, D. O., & Mbiyu, M. (2017). Climatic change, its likely impact on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production in Kenya and plausible coping measures. International Journal of Horticulture, 7(14): 115-123.
[40] Muthoni, J. & Nyamongo, D. O. (2009). A review of constraints to ware Irish potatoes production in Kenya. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 1(7), 98-102.
[41] NPCK. (2022). Seed potato dormancy for registered varieties.
[42] NPCK. (2018). Potato production handbook. A guideline for farmers and trainers. National potato council of Kenya. Accessed on 16th April 2025.
[43] NPCK. (2015). Potato production handbook. A guideline for farmers and trainers. National potato council of Kenya. Accessed on 13th April 2025.
[44] Obare, G., Nyagaka, D., Nguyo, W. and Mwakubo, S. (2010). Are Kenyan Smallholders Allocatively Efficient? Evidence from Irish Potato Producers in Nyandarua North District, Egerton University Found, Egerton.
[45] Parry, M. L., Rosenzweig, C. and Livermore, M. (2005). Climate change, global food supply and risk of hunger. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 360, 2125-2138.
[46] Raymundo, R., Asseng, S., Robertson, R., Petsakos, A., Hoogenboom, G., Quiroz, R., Hareau, G., & Wolf, J. (2018). Climate change impact on global potato production. European Journal of Agronomy.
[47] Potatopro. (2021). Agricultural statistics in Kenya
[48] Sebatta, C., Mugisha J., Kasharu, A., and Kyomugisha, H., (2015). Adding value at the farm: the case of smallholder potato farmers in the highlands of Uganda. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, economics and sociology. Handling and storage methods for fresh roots and tubers
[49] Tesfahunegn, G. B. and Gebru, T. A (2021). Climate change effects on agricultural production: insights for adaptation strategy from the context of smallholder farmers in Dura catchment, northern Ethiopia. GeoJournal, 1-14.
[50] Timothy, N., Lillian, K., Kevin, O., and Nthenya, K. (2014). The status of the agricultural sector after devolution to county governments. Tegemeo institute of Agricultural policy and development.
[51] United Nations. (2015). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP. 241.
[52] Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row.
[53] Yenenesh, T., Conny, J. M., Almekinders, D. G. & Paul, C. S. (2020). Collective Production and Marketing of Quality Potato Seed: Experiences from Two Cooperatives in Chencha, Ethiopia, Forum for Development Studies, 47: 1, 139-156,
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kabochi, F. N., Mingate, F. L. M., Ochola, S. O. (2025). Irish Potato Production and Consumption Amid Climate Change and Variability Among Small Scale Farmers in Narok South Sub- County-Kenya. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 10(3), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kabochi, F. N.; Mingate, F. L. M.; Ochola, S. O. Irish Potato Production and Consumption Amid Climate Change and Variability Among Small Scale Farmers in Narok South Sub- County-Kenya. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2025, 10(3), 155-169. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kabochi FN, Mingate FLM, Ochola SO. Irish Potato Production and Consumption Amid Climate Change and Variability Among Small Scale Farmers in Narok South Sub- County-Kenya. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2025;10(3):155-169. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11,
      author = {Francis Njoroge Kabochi and Felix Lamech Mogambi Mingate and Samuel Ogada Ochola},
      title = {Irish Potato Production and Consumption Amid Climate Change and Variability Among Small Scale Farmers in Narok South Sub- County-Kenya
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {155-169},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20251003.11},
      abstract = {This study explored on Irish potato production and consumption among small scale farmers amid climate change and variability in Narok south sub- county-Kenya. The study employed focus group discussions and cross sectional descriptive survey research methods for data collection. A total of 393 small scale farmers were randomly sampled through multistage sampling procedure for descriptive survey and controlled focus groups discussion. Data from the cross section survey was screened and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 program to give frequencies and percentages. Chi-square was calculated and inference made at confidence level of α=0.05. focus groups discussion was analysed qualitatively. The results indicated that, majority (71.5%) of the respondents got their Irish potato seeds for planting from previous harvest. Handsomely 64.1% of the respondents responded by indicating that they planted other crops when they lacked Irish potato seeds. The study further indicated that, significant 92.9% of farmers were not taking on any an initiative on value addition method which could enhance their money in their pockets. Majority (76.9%) didn’t know how to make French fries in their homes nor sell it to their neighbours. The study moreover, indicated that a sizeable (35.3%) of the respondents consume Irish potato as an accompaniment to other foods. Further, about 33.2% of the respondents indicated that, they consume Irish potato as main dish. The study also highlighted that 82.3% of the respondents highly observed pest and disease as Irish potato production challenges amid climate change and variability. The study concluded that climate change and variability has influence on Irish potato production and consumption and therefore affecting food security and availability in Narok County. This study therefore recommends that; the agricultural extension agents should endeavour to train farmers on positive potato seed selection or similarly direct farmers where they can get certified quality Irish potato seeds.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Irish Potato Production and Consumption Amid Climate Change and Variability Among Small Scale Farmers in Narok South Sub- County-Kenya
    
    AU  - Francis Njoroge Kabochi
    AU  - Felix Lamech Mogambi Mingate
    AU  - Samuel Ogada Ochola
    Y1  - 2025/07/30
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11
    T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
    JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
    JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
    SP  - 155
    EP  - 169
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3061
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20251003.11
    AB  - This study explored on Irish potato production and consumption among small scale farmers amid climate change and variability in Narok south sub- county-Kenya. The study employed focus group discussions and cross sectional descriptive survey research methods for data collection. A total of 393 small scale farmers were randomly sampled through multistage sampling procedure for descriptive survey and controlled focus groups discussion. Data from the cross section survey was screened and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0 program to give frequencies and percentages. Chi-square was calculated and inference made at confidence level of α=0.05. focus groups discussion was analysed qualitatively. The results indicated that, majority (71.5%) of the respondents got their Irish potato seeds for planting from previous harvest. Handsomely 64.1% of the respondents responded by indicating that they planted other crops when they lacked Irish potato seeds. The study further indicated that, significant 92.9% of farmers were not taking on any an initiative on value addition method which could enhance their money in their pockets. Majority (76.9%) didn’t know how to make French fries in their homes nor sell it to their neighbours. The study moreover, indicated that a sizeable (35.3%) of the respondents consume Irish potato as an accompaniment to other foods. Further, about 33.2% of the respondents indicated that, they consume Irish potato as main dish. The study also highlighted that 82.3% of the respondents highly observed pest and disease as Irish potato production challenges amid climate change and variability. The study concluded that climate change and variability has influence on Irish potato production and consumption and therefore affecting food security and availability in Narok County. This study therefore recommends that; the agricultural extension agents should endeavour to train farmers on positive potato seed selection or similarly direct farmers where they can get certified quality Irish potato seeds.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

    Biography: Francis Njoroge Kabochi is an agricultural extension officer at Narok county government. He completed his master’s degree in Environmental studies and community development at Kenyatta University, Kenya in 2013. He has vast experience on agriculture extension spanning over 25 years. Currently he is pursuing PhD in Environmental Studies and Community Development at Kenyatta university- Kenya.

    Research Fields: research fields includes; Agricultural extension, Climate change and sustainability, Community development, Human ecology and adaptations

  • School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

    Biography: Felix Lamech Mogambi Mingate is a Doctor at Kenyatta University, department of Environmental Studies and Community Development. He completed his PhD in Environmental Planning and Management, Lincoln University, New Zealand in 2013, and his Master of Environmental Planning and Management, Kenyatta University in 2002. Dr. Mingate is exceptionally recognized for his research contributions and publications. He has been on editorial Boards of numerous publications and currently serves as chair of department of Environmental Studies and Community Development of Kenyatta university.

    Research Fields: research fields includes: Environmental governance and community livelihoods, Management of ecosystem services, Participatory forest management, Modern green energy, Climate change

  • School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

    Biography: Samuel Ogada Ochola is a Doctor at Kenyatta University, department of Environmental Studies and Community Development. Dr. Ochola holds a Dr. rer. nat. (MAGNA CUM LAUDE) in Geosciences from the University of Heidelberg -Germany. His doctoral work was on integrated flood risk management highlighting options for land-use planning at river basin level. He holds a M.Sc. in Geological Risks and Management from the University of Geneva - Switzerland, M.Sc. in Environmental Geology and Management from the University of Nairobi. He had Advanced Study of Disaster and Risk 2009 Summer Institute at Beijing Normal University, METIER (Methods of Interdisciplinary Environmental Research) at Wageningen University and Multidisciplinary Tropical Lakes Studies with the University of Arizona.

    Research Fields: research fields includes: Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Disaster Risks Reduction, Land Use and Planning, Climate Change, Integrated Water Resources Management, and Community Adaptation

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussions
    4. 4. Conclusion and Recommendations
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • Data Availability Statement
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information